- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 35,697
Did anybody else see this?
My opinion is pretty much the same as the status quo of the reviews - Carrie Underwood's rendition of the songs was awesome, and she's pretty as a pea, but her acting sucked. Also, because she was performing live on stage, she really didn't have the choice to address the music as lyrically as Julie Andrews was able too - but that's okay; that's the nature of live theater.
I don't listen to her music, and I only found out yesterday that she once won American Idol.
I don't know how "live" it was; I would have seen the taped West Coast feed.
I had never a stage version of The Sound of Music before - there were significant differences in the chronology of the songs, and a fairly significant plot detail or two from the iconic movie; that said, that's not unusual; when a stage musical is made into a film often a number of things are different; when I performed in West Side Story at Michigan in 1983, there were a lot of things that were different from the movie.
There were also a few addtional numbers that weren't included in the movie; I would imagine they are from the original Rogers and Hammerstein score.
They were trying to sell the DVD like it was nobody's business during the commercials; if anyone is curious I wouldn't buy it; I'd wait until somebody I knew had it, and borrow it.
Anyhoo, it was interesting to see it for the novelty, and that's about it.
For me, from now on, I'll stick with the classic film version from the 60s.
My opinion is pretty much the same as the status quo of the reviews - Carrie Underwood's rendition of the songs was awesome, and she's pretty as a pea, but her acting sucked. Also, because she was performing live on stage, she really didn't have the choice to address the music as lyrically as Julie Andrews was able too - but that's okay; that's the nature of live theater.
I don't listen to her music, and I only found out yesterday that she once won American Idol.
I don't know how "live" it was; I would have seen the taped West Coast feed.
I had never a stage version of The Sound of Music before - there were significant differences in the chronology of the songs, and a fairly significant plot detail or two from the iconic movie; that said, that's not unusual; when a stage musical is made into a film often a number of things are different; when I performed in West Side Story at Michigan in 1983, there were a lot of things that were different from the movie.
There were also a few addtional numbers that weren't included in the movie; I would imagine they are from the original Rogers and Hammerstein score.
They were trying to sell the DVD like it was nobody's business during the commercials; if anyone is curious I wouldn't buy it; I'd wait until somebody I knew had it, and borrow it.
Anyhoo, it was interesting to see it for the novelty, and that's about it.
For me, from now on, I'll stick with the classic film version from the 60s.