Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Mark Cuban: NCAA is 'hypocritical'

biggunsbob

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
94,818
By Tim MacMahon | ESPNDallas.com

DALLAS -- Mavericks owner Mark Cuban believes it's in the best interests of elite prospects to play in the NBA Development League instead of spending one season in college.

"I think what will end up happening -- and this is my opinion, not that of the league -- is if the colleges don't change from the one-and-done, we'll go after the one," Cuban said. "The NCAA rules are so hypocritical, there's absolutely no reason for a kid to go [to college], because he's not going to class [and] he's actually not even able to take advantage of all the fun because the first semester he starts playing basketball. So if the goal is just to graduate to the NBA or be an NBA player, go to the D-League."

Under the NBA's current collective bargaining agreement, players must be one year out of high school and 19 years old to play in the league. However, the minimum age for the D-League is 18.

Cuban would like to see the NBA take steps to make the D-League a more attractive alternative to players who intend to spend only one season playing college basketball. While Cuban said he hasn't analyzed the situation enough to make a formal proposal, he envisions the NBA working with nearby universities to provide straight-out-of-high school players an opportunity to pursue a college education while playing in the D-League.

Cuban suggests guaranteeing college tuition for such players, whether or not they pan out as NBA prospects, as an incentive.

"We can get rid of all the hypocrisy and improve the education," Cuban said. "If the whole plan is just to go to college for one year maybe or just the first semester, that's not a student-athlete. That's ridiculous.

"You don't have to pretend. We don't have to pretend. A major college has to pretend that they're treating them like a student-athlete, and it's a big lie and we all know it's a big lie. At least at most schools, not all. ... But we can put more of an emphasis on their education. We can plan it out, have tutors. We can do all kinds of things that the NCAA doesn't allow schools to do that would really put the individual first."

Cuban's biggest concern about one-and-done prospects is that they're often not mentally, emotionally and psychologically prepared for the NBA after spending only one season in a college environment.

He believes the D-League could provide a better atmosphere for freshman-age players to develop on and off the court.


"You have to develop some level of maturity, and that has to be part of the process," Cuban said. "You don't want to bring kids in and just abandon them. That'd be the worst thing we could do.

"We'd have to make it so where there'd be very strict policies and rules so that, even if you're not going to go to [college] class, there's going be life [skills] classes -- how do you deal with the world? -- and you have to attend those. You have to keep up with those. We'd have very strict [rules] on why you'd be suspended if you didn't live up to them. Things that should be done to student-athletes in college and are just not. Or not always."

Cuban's preference is that the NBA minimum age limit moves to 21 and three years out of high school. However, he can envision lowering the age limit for players who go to the D-League.

"We'd have to think it through," Cuban said. "I'm not trying to jump to conclusions and say I've analyzed this whole thing out. I haven't. But what I'm saying the interest is you're to maximize your ability for your chosen profession but you'd also have to make a commitment of some sort one way or the other, either to life skills training and/or academic training."

One conclusion that Cuban has reached: Playing in the NCAA is not the ideal way to prepare for an NBA career. He hopes the D-League emerges as a clearly superior option.

"Then you wouldn't be under the stupidity of the NCAA," Cuban said. "There's no reason for the NCAA to exist. None."
 
One conclusion that Cuban has reached: Playing in the NCAA is not the ideal way to prepare for an NBA career. He hopes the D-League emerges as a clearly superior option.

"Then you wouldn't be under the stupidity of the NCAA," Cuban said. "There's no reason for the NCAA to exist. None."

This is kind of a dumb statement.

Most scholarship athletes aren't preparing for a career in the NBA.

Most aren't even playing basketball.

Football and basketball fund soccer and field hockey and softball and swimming and diving and a whole bunch of other sports that create scholarships for student athletes who aren't good enough basketball players to play in an NBA associated D League.

That said, if Cuban wants to create a D League that is gonna divert some basketball players from participating in the NCAA he can go ahead and knock himself out, it's a free country brother, right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvtbRfne3cA
 
This is kind of a dumb statement.

Most scholarship athletes aren't preparing for a career in the NBA.

Most aren't even playing basketball.

Football and basketball fund soccer and field hockey and softball and swimming and diving and a whole bunch of other sports that create scholarships for student athletes who aren't good enough basketball players to play in an NBA associated D League.

That said, if Cuban wants to create a D League that is gonna divert some basketball players from participating in the NCAA he can go ahead and knock himself out, it's a free country brother, right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvtbRfne3cA


Exactly! I think there are about 350 D1 basketball teams. Based on each team being allowed to give out 13 scholarships that is 4550 full ride scholarships per year. Last year there were 9 one and done players that entered / got drafted. I'm sure that the other 4541 kids on scholarship appreciate what the NCAA has to offer.
 
while I agree with him cause the reality the one n doners aren't there to get an education......the choice still remains:

1) go to fake school for a year to bang some chicks and play some ball. go top 10 and make millions

2) go to the d league and make a couple grand....D league gets flooded with poor talent. Talent evaluators have a hard time figuring out who the real players are and you get stuck in the D league for more than a year.

the choice is still not even close to being a choice. Go bang chicks for a year then become a millionaire....
 
while I agree with him cause the reality the one n doners aren't there to get an education......the choice still remains:

1) go to fake school for a year to bang some chicks and play some ball. go top 10 and make millions

2) go to the d league and make a couple grand....D league gets flooded with poor talent. Talent evaluators have a hard time figuring out who the real players are and you get stuck in the D league for more than a year.

the choice is still not even close to being a choice. Go bang chicks for a year then become a millionaire....while still making thousands from boosters

fixed it for you!
 
This is kind of a dumb statement.

Most scholarship athletes aren't preparing for a career in the NBA.

Most aren't even playing basketball.

Football and basketball fund soccer and field hockey and softball and swimming and diving and a whole bunch of other sports that create scholarships for student athletes who aren't good enough basketball players to play in an NBA associated D League.

That said, if Cuban wants to create a D League that is gonna divert some basketball players from participating in the NCAA he can go ahead and knock himself out, it's a free country brother, right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvtbRfne3cA

Most of those people are being brought into the school because they contribute to an athletic program that make the school money.

Why should we necessarily care that some of the student athletes won't be getting huge scholarships to get an education that they may or may not use? Why can't those kids just go to school like every other student there if the education is so important?

Furthermore, why do we assume if the really good prospects go straight to a professional level that it would make a difference anyway? College athletics survive mostly on branding and the engagement of the school/students/alumni and not so much on quality anyway because they are well below the professional level already.
 
Most of those people are being brought into the school because they contribute to an athletic program that make the school money.

Why should we necessarily care that some of the student athletes won't be getting huge scholarships to get an education that they may or may not use? Why can't those kids just go to school like every other student there if the education is so important?

Furthermore, why do we assume if the really good prospects go straight to a professional level that it would make a difference anyway? College athletics survive mostly on branding and the engagement of the school/students/alumni and not so much on quality anyway because they are well below the professional level already.

most athletic departments lose money
 
most athletic departments lose money

A lot of the press and goodwill athletic departments generate help tremendously with enrollment and alumni donations.

If the opposite were true, they would be giving out valuable college scholarships to student athletes for absolutely no reason at all.
 
Last edited:
A lot of the press and goodwill athletic departments generate help tremendously with enrollment and alumni donations.

If the opposite were true, they would be giving out valuable college scholarships to student athletes for absolutely no reason at all.

probably true for 90% of athletic departments. There are only a handful of athletic departments that are profitable. I think that schools have athletics because students think that having sports teams to root for enhances their college experience. The students don't realize that they are paying for this experience with higher tuition and student fees to support the athletic departments.
 
Didn't we just do this? The whole revenue teams vs athletic department thing? It's irrelevant. If the profitability of the department was the issue, they'd cut wrestling.
 
Back
Top