Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Michigan Bowl Predictions

[color=#551A8B said:
BestIsBest[/color]]
[quote="Danny Diggler":0smwxygh]

Why would the Sugar Bowl pick Boise when they don't have to? I very much doubt it will be Boise.

Brad Edwards, ESPN's BCS guy has them there.[/quote:0smwxygh]

Is he on the Sugar Bowl Committee? Does he take into effect ratings and marketing? Boise's small fan base in the Mountain West vs. KSU's moderate fan base and a huge market Big 12? Money talks..
 
[color=#551A8B said:
Danny Diggler[/color]]
[quote="BestIsBest":cc8ka2ya]

Brad Edwards, ESPN's BCS guy has them there.

Is he on the Sugar Bowl Committee? Does he take into effect ratings and marketing? Boise's small fan base in the Mountain West vs. KSU's moderate fan base and a huge market Big 12? Money talks..[/quote:cc8ka2ya]

ESPN
 
if you remember the Sugar Bowl LAST YEAR... their sleazy committee chairman was one of the major forces pushing the NCAA to allow the "Tat 5" to serve their suspensions after the season so ratings wouldn't suffer for the game.

All they care about is landing the biggest-money-matchup.

Bottom line: If Boise can't guarantee bigger ad revenue & TV audience numbers than KState can (and they probably can't) they will not be selected.
 
[color=#551A8B said:
BestIsBest[/color]]
[quote="Danny Diggler":7qa6epr9]

Is he on the Sugar Bowl Committee? Does he take into effect ratings and marketing? Boise's small fan base in the Mountain West vs. KSU's moderate fan base and a huge market Big 12? Money talks..

ESPN
 
How do the BCS Bowls juggle who gets stuck with the bum "small market" team? Is it just whoever doesn't have a conference tie in (a la the Rose Bowl w/the Big Ten/PAC12)?

I know there was a consensus last season that no bowl committee wanted to get stuck with a TCU-Boise State matchup.
 
MichChamp02 said:
How do the BCS Bowls juggle who gets stuck with the bum "small market"

I know there was a consensus last season that no bowl committee wanted to get stuck with a TCU-Boise State matchup.

I think that feeling still applies.
 
MichChamp02 said:
How do the BCS Bowls juggle who gets stuck with the bum "small market" team? Is it just whoever doesn't have a conference tie in (a la the Rose Bowl w/the Big Ten/PAC12)?

I know there was a consensus last season that no bowl committee wanted to get stuck with a TCU-Boise State matchup.

Team selection procedures
The bowls will select their participants from two pools: (1) automatic qualifiers, all of which must be selected, and, (2) at-large teams, if fewer than 10 teams qualify automatically. The following sequence will be used when establishing pairings:

1. The top two teams in the final BCS Standings will be placed in the National Championship Game ("NCG").

2. Unless they qualify to play in the NCG, the champions of selected conferences are contractually committed to host selected games:

Atlantic Coast Conference-Orange Bowl
Big Ten Conference-Rose Bowl
Big 12 Conference-Fiesta Bowl
Pac-12 Conference-Rose Bowl
Southeastern Conference-Sugar Bowl

3. If a bowl loses a host team to the NCG, then such bowl shall select a replacement team from among the automatic-qualifying teams and the at-large teams before any other selections are made. If two bowls lose host teams to the NCG, each bowl will get a replacement pick before any other selections are made. In such case, the bowl losing the No. 1 team gets the first replacement pick, and the bowl losing the No. 2 team gets the second replacement pick. If the Rose Bowl loses both the Big Ten and Pac-12 champions to the NCG, it will receive two replacement picks.

For the games of January 2011 through 2014, the first year the Rose Bowl loses a team to the NCG and a team from the non-AQ group is an automatic qualifier, that non-AQ team will play in the Rose Bowl.

A bowl choosing a replacement team may not select any of the following:

A. A team in the NCG;
B. The host team for another BCS Bowl;
C. When two bowls lose host teams, then the bowl losing the number one team may not select a replacement team from the same conference as the number two team, unless the bowl losing the number two team consents.

4. After steps No. 1, 2 and 3 have been completed, any bowl with an unfilled slot shall select a team from the automatic qualifiers and/or at-large teams in the following order for the games played in 2007 through 2010:


January 2011 games: Sugar, Orange, Fiesta


January 2012 games: Fiesta, Sugar, Orange


January 2013 games: Fiesta, Sugar, Orange


January 2014 games: Orange, Sugar, Fiesta
 
No matter the opponent, we can all agree that it is nice to see Michigan in the BCS somewhere...
 
Looks like we are playing Kansas State in the Sugar Bowl! GO BLUE!!!!!
 
Heh. Koger just said on Twitter that he knows where they're going and who they're playing but is forbidden to tell, lol.

And right below that someone tweeted that Mike Martin spilled the secret and that they're going to Sugar Bowl against VaTech.
 
josh200612 said:

LOL, the person who tweeted Mike told him VaTech could be anyone and just trying to start stuff. We won't know if that's true for another 23 minutes ;)
 
jesndave said:
josh200612 said:

LOL, the person who tweeted Mike told him VaTeck could be anyone and just trying to start stuff. We won't know if that's true for another 23 minutes ;)


That would be crazy if we played them LOL but all I'm hearing is Kansas State. I've been sitting here all day waiting for this they need to hurry up!
 
Back
Top