Noots 2nd Wife Bombshell

[lions2011]

Noots pulled even with Mitten in S.C.

I think this thing with the wife is a minor bump...no real traction..he admitted he was a reformed scumbag months ago.

he took all this shit away from his opponets to drag up.

 

[mhughes0021]

its not just this instance with newt.....its ALLLLLL the instances combined which makes him a scum bag. theres just too many instances of him being a sleeze bag. When youre banging a chick while your wife is in the hospital recovering from cancer youre usually a douche.

yep - You'll never find me disagreeing with that, but I maintain, this interview with wife #2 will play a very minor roll in his downfall. I think that was my original post, and even though we don't agree on lot's of things, even you have to at least agree that being a scumbag generally doesn't cost you an election/nomination if you have the proper political machine in place to handle it.

oh...you mean billionaire PACs like Adelson that give you $5 million to run your campaign. Money cant buy you love kawdup!

 

[Michchamp]

. . . and his philandering was pretty well publicized and really isn't secret at all if you paid any attention. I'm surprised - I thought you said you read the Huffington Post?

...

is this directed to me? No, I don't regularly read HuffPo. as much as I may identify more with the democrats/liberal way of thinking, HuffPo is for the most part awful, just like its founder, Arriana.

I get my news from a variety of sources, but a lot of it from Salon, and in particular a few columnists there. Some of their stuff is slanted, but I've been reading it for years, and they consistently have the most objective viewpoints in my opinion. I think some guys just get turned off by the name and think of it as a chick site, but of course, it's not referring to a hair salon...

 

[KAWDUP]

yep - You'll never find me disagreeing with that, but I maintain, this interview with wife #2 will play a very minor roll in his downfall. I think that was my original post, and even though we don't agree on lot's of things, even you have to at least agree that being a scumbag generally doesn't cost you an election/nomination if you have the proper political machine in place to handle it.

oh...you mean billionaire PACs like Adelson that give you $5 million to run your campaign. Money cant buy you love kawdup!

. . . but it can sure buy you an election.

. . . worse still it cuts both ways. There is no way only one party has this "market" cornered - or even a huge majority.

<cough> . . . <cough> . . . Soros.

 

[KAWDUP]

. . . and his philandering was pretty well publicized and really isn't secret at all if you paid any attention. I'm surprised - I thought you said you read the Huffington Post?

...

is this directed to me? No, I don't regularly read HuffPo. as much as I may identify more with the democrats/liberal way of thinking, HuffPo is for the most part awful, just like its founder, Arriana.

I get my news from a variety of sources, but a lot of it from Salon, and in particular a few columnists there. Some of their stuff is slanted, but I've been reading it for years, and they consistently have the most objective viewpoints in my opinion. I think some guys just get turned off by the name and think of it as a chick site, but of course, it's not referring to a hair salon...

It wasn't specifically directed to you. The general point was that this was old news and available on most news outlets for some time.

Don't want to start a new argument about Salon and its credibility. I'll just say I have read it, and do get information from there once in a awhile.

Lastly, based on the latest polling after his answer in the debate, he may even get a bump from it.

 

[lions2011]

was kind of funny to watch Noot school John King last night when the first question he asked him about was the 2nd wife popping off in an ABC interview.