This angle of the incident has some people on talk radio and blogs defending Jayru. Their argument is that the security guard instigated the incident by putting his hands on Jayru at one point during the confrontation.
What I believe we see is the guard directing Jayru to remove his hoodie, Jayru not complying, the guard pointing/gesturing for Jayru to report somewhere else to further document the offense and subsequent refusal to comply.
Jayru then begins to walk in the opposite direction. The guard begins to move into his path. Jayru shoves the guard. The guard then re-approaches Jayru and they rather simultaneously lock arms.
At this point, the guard?s hands are indeed on Jayru and Jayru?s hands are indeed on the guard. But the only way to characterize the guard?s contact with Jayru is ?hands on him?. There doesn?t seem to be any shove, push, strike, nor any intent to move Jayru?s person.
On the other hand, Jayru clearly shoves the guard, and of course body slams him.
I would argue that the guard putting ?hands on? Jayru in no way excuses, or even lessens the severity of Jayru?s actions. We can?t live in a society where if a person simply puts ?hands on? another person (without a strike, push, or shove, or any force) it becomes a consequence-free, or even consequence-mitigated situation for them to pick that person up and throw them down on their head, back, shoulders, whatever.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10152220114589187&stream_ref=10