- Thread Author
- #1
kingofdetroit57
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2011
- Messages
- 3,937
I've been pretty tuned out on sports and news lately, but I'm still up to speed with most major things that penetrate my bubble of caring about. It sucks to lose Suh, but I can't help but believe we've got a good chance to end up as a better team as a result. That's assuming, of course, that we spend the money wisely... which we aren't really historically known to do.
Anyhow, just as a point of discussion, what combo of players could we sign in FA (assume that we can land whoever we want for the cost they command) for the Suh money/years we had to offer?
For example, would Suh = Tulloch + Fairley + Prater + Wilfork or something like that? If so, I'd have to believe the combo of four quality players would make us much better than one superstar. Just curoius what this means in examples of players instead of just dollars and cap space.
Anyhow, just as a point of discussion, what combo of players could we sign in FA (assume that we can land whoever we want for the cost they command) for the Suh money/years we had to offer?
For example, would Suh = Tulloch + Fairley + Prater + Wilfork or something like that? If so, I'd have to believe the combo of four quality players would make us much better than one superstar. Just curoius what this means in examples of players instead of just dollars and cap space.