Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

The Squad

Here is a lefty site that has sniffed the fake out; I haven?t found a right wing state reporting the same thing but my guess is there is one that I just can?t find yet on a search engines search yet.

Hmmmm... seems to me one might call this "Two parties that agree on everything but abortion"... and it would align with The Fish Hook theory I posted about.

*pats self on back*

*looks in the mirror and smiles*
 
Hmmmm... seems to me one might call this "Two parties that agree on everything but abortion"... and it would align with The Fish Hook theory I posted about.

*pats self on back*

*looks in the mirror and smiles*

I look at things from a number of different perspectives, and on these boards I have always acknowledged that this is one of the perspectives that I look at things from. I have always describe it as the ?kabuki dance.?

EDIT: I didn?t come up with it, it seems to go back to Henry J. Taylor of the Los Angeles Times in 1961, to refer to political posturing.
 
Last edited:
I look at things from a number of different perspectives, and on these boards I have always acknowledged that this is one of the perspectives that I look at things from. I have always describe it as the ?kabuki dance.?

EDIT: I didn?t come up with it, it seems to go back to Henry J. Taylor of the Los Angeles Times in 1961, to refer to political posturing.

The Kabuki Dance is more succinct than "Two Parties The Agree on Everything but Abortion."

I didn't come up with that either.

i'll go with Kabuki dance now though, since it will save internet space, and we're all on the same page with this, at least those of us "woke" or "intelligent" enough to recognize it.
 
Hmmmm... seems to me one might call this "Two parties that agree on everything but abortion"... and it would align with The Fish Hook theory I posted about.

*pats self on back*

*looks in the mirror and smiles*

the idea that there is any support for the fish hook theory is laughable. to even believe in the horseshoe theory you first have to fall for the lie that fascism is a right wing ideology. Its not, its a radical left wing ideology.
 
The Kabuki Dance is more succinct than "Two Parties The Agree on Everything but Abortion."

I didn't come up with that either.

i'll go with Kabuki dance now though, since it will save internet space, and we're all on the same page with this, at least those of us "woke" or "intelligent" enough to recognize it.


Every time I hear the word WOKE I think of this


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UNin5ms_pc
 
https://apnews.com/f2b66f5807cd44d78745a7be8f342829


WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Donald Trump said Thursday he was unhappy with his supporters chanting ?send her back? after he assailed a young Democratic congresswoman who he?s suggested should leave the U.S.

Speaking in the Oval Office, Trump claimed he tried to stop the chant, which came after he recited a litany of complaints about Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, who fled to the U.S. as a child with her family from violence-wracked Somalia. Video shows the president pausing his remarks, appearing to drink in the uproar and not admonishing his supporters as they chanted.

?I was not happy with it,? Trump said a day later as some prominent Republicans criticized the chant at the president?s re-election event. He said he ?would certainly try? to stop the chant should it return at a subsequent rally.

So far, no GOP lawmakers are directly taking on Trump over the episode.
The muted reactions by congressional Republicans followed a pattern that?s become familiar after numerous incidents in Trump?s presidency when he?s made antagonistic or racially provocative comments.

At the Wednesday campaign rally in Greenville, North Carolina, Trump tore into four progressive freshman congresswomen who last weekend he tweeted should return to their native countries if they ?hate America.? Of the four, who strongly oppose many of Trump?s policies, one is black, one is Hispanic and two are Muslim. All are American citizens, and three were born here.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., told reporters that such cries ?have no place in our party and no place in this country.?

But McCarthy, a staunch Trump ally, said the president?s aversion to Omar is based on ideology, not race.

?This is about socialism vs. freedom,? he said, a refrain Republicans are increasingly using as they begin trying to frame their offensive against Democrats for the 2020 presidential and congressional campaigns.

GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois tweeted that the ?send her back? chant was ?ugly, wrong, & would send chills down the spines of our Founding Fathers. This ugliness must end, or we risk our great union.?

Rep. Tom Emmer, who heads the House GOP?s campaign organization, told reporters, ?There?s no place for that kind of talk. I don?t agree with it.?

But he defended Trump, saying there isn?t ?a racist bone in this president?s body? and asserting that Trump ?said wrong? what he actually meant.

?What he was trying to say is that if you don?t appreciate this country, you don?t have to be here. That goes for every one of us. It has nothing to do with your race, your gender, your family history. It has to do with respecting and loving the country that has given you the opportunities which you have.?
 
Last edited:
Trump is lying; he didn't try to stop it, and regardless he is responsible for starting it by tweeting about Omar, et al.

fuck him, and fuck anyone who would chant that... buncha animals.
 
I don’t disagree if I ever go to a trump rally I won’t be one going along with any over the top chants like that I never cared for lock her up either the problem with lock her up either if trump meant what he said then I’ll expect him to say no no please don’t next time a chant breaks out at the next rally. I don’t think they are a bunch of animals though, that would be ms13 that are the animals
 
I don?t disagree if I ever go to a trump rally I won?t be one going along with any over the top chants like that I never cared for lock her up either the problem with lock her up either if trump meant what he said then I?ll expect him to say no no please don?t next time a chant breaks out at the next rally. I don?t think they are a bunch of animals though, that would be ms13 that are the animals

Call me "triggered" but The sort of person that would demand we deport a sitting congressman for expressing opinions they don't like, is not as different as someone who would join MS-13... in the former case, they were just lucky not to be born poor, in a village in Guatemala, Nicaragua or El Salvador, etc.

Neither MS-13 nor the MAGA crowd demonstrates much of a concern for law and order, or our Constitutional principles.
 
Call me "triggered" but The sort of person that would demand we deport a sitting congressman for expressing opinions they don't like, is not as different as someone who would join MS-13... in the former case, they were just lucky not to be born poor, in a village in Guatemala, Nicaragua or El Salvador, etc.

Neither MS-13 nor the MAGA crowd demonstrates much of a concern for law and order, or our Constitutional principles.

Triggered
 
Yeah he was a little before all of our time?but a recent CNN and MS NBC combined survey showed that nevertheless, 99% of millennial women who favor socialism know that Roy Rogers?s horse was named Trigger.

Well ain?t that some shit
 
Things "before my time"
1. Reconstruction
2. The Wilmot Proviso
3. The Magna Carta
4. The Old Baltimore Orioles

I have heard of all of them.
 
Back
Top