cheeno
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 9,194
When people I approve of join my teams or gain more influence within them, that's good. When bad people get the boot, that's good. I think the good guys are winning overall because the world is getting better.
Penn State, being an academic institution, is good (but not as good as Michigan.) Athletic departments are in the grey region these days. I don't know how many people are involved with Penn State's athletic department, but I think it's safe to say that that if you call them the bad guys, for every actual bad guy, you're throwing at least dozens of unaware nonparticipants under the bus. Penn State needs to make sure that it's purged itself of the bad guys, and organizations everywhere need to get the message and follow suit.
What do you think of nations? Are any nations good guys in your book?
Well to me when 'good' doesn't take a stand against the 'bad', or fail to take any stand at all, then it is fair to tar whole organizations with the same brush, knowing full well that their are a lot of 'good', unaware, and non-participants that are thrown under the bus.
As far as nations go once you get to that scale things become far more complex and good becomes a much more relative term and less cut and dry.
Last edited: