Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Internet Censorship.

I'm not sure if the Bezos comment about the chicoms and Elon was serious or not. the lefty people sure are up in arms over Elon buying twitter though. IDK I have to think that's a good thing.
 
https://www.zerohedge.com/political...reaks-down-tears-during-musk-takeover-meeting

tenor.gif
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure if the Bezos comment about the chicoms and Elon was serious or not. the lefty people sure are up in arms over Elon buying twitter though. IDK I have to think that's a good thing.

You are admitting you're not capable of thinking for yourself here
 
hearing rumblings now that dems might support section 230 now since Elon upset their apple harvest cart. These people are repulsive.
 
Yeah, silly me for not going maskless like Buck Fiden wants me to. Sheeple

Biden doesn't want you to go maskless and you know that - that's why you still wear the silly masks. This is a new one though - the "mask wearers are the people who think for themselves." You can't be dumb enough to believe that, this has to be just another exercise in mental gymnastics to make yourself feel better for just doing what you're told, right?
 
I'm not sure if the Bezos comment about the chicoms and Elon was serious or not. the lefty people sure are up in arms over Elon buying twitter though. IDK I have to think that's a good thing.

You can do a search for "Elon Musk" + "China" and see a number of articles over the past couple years criticizing him for praising China, their government, and their economy.

like this one. Curious what/if anything he did about Tesla's data collection practices that upset the dreaded Chicoms.

Now, I personally don't care about him praising China. But based on your posts here, I'd imagine this would be a big red flag for you.

I guess your brain algorithm ranks "pissing off teh libs" as more important than "opposing the chicoms"
 
You can do a search for "Elon Musk" + "China" and see a number of articles over the past couple years criticizing him for praising China, their government, and their economy.

like this one. Curious what/if anything he did about Tesla's data collection practices that upset the dreaded Chicoms.

Now, I personally don't care about him praising China. But based on your posts here, I'd imagine this would be a big red flag for you.

I guess your brain algorithm ranks "pissing off teh libs" as more important than "opposing the chicoms"
Do you think Elon Musk watched that one fast and furious movies that John Cena was in?
 
You can do a search for "Elon Musk" + "China" and see a number of articles over the past couple years criticizing him for praising China, their government, and their economy.

like this one. Curious what/if anything he did about Tesla's data collection practices that upset the dreaded Chicoms.

Now, I personally don't care about him praising China. But based on your posts here, I'd imagine this would be a big red flag for you.

I guess your brain algorithm ranks "pissing off teh libs" as more important than "opposing the chicoms"

because you have to either like everything a person says and does or dislike all of it, you can't agree with someone on some things and disagree with that person on others.
 
Do you think Elon Musk watched that one fast and furious movies that John Cena was in?

is that the movie he was in where he had to issue an apology to China for some reason (and did)?

I bet Elon probably did watch it. Billionaires have terrible taste and are low brow generally, so... yeah.

because you have to either like everything a person says and does or dislike all of it, you can't agree with someone on some things and disagree with that person on others.

Well, I didn't ask you, and he has pretty strong feelings about China, so I'm interested in his response.

Since you're here though, what is your opinion on China? You probably hate Chinese people, but like China itself for providing cheap labor and letting our billionaires shift production there and away from American workers. Right? That's consistent with your pro-billionaire, pro-wealth gap ethos.
 
Yes, that?s the one.

My kids think he's the greatest, so I can't be too hard on him.

But also, I managed to convince them I knew John Cena in college, and I kicked his ass back then, before he got huge. and also, I could still kick his ass today, based on the psychological advantage I now have over him. my kids are pretty dumb, eh?
 
My kids think he's the greatest, so I can't be too hard on him.

But also, I managed to convince them I knew John Cena in college, and I kicked his ass back then, before he got huge. and also, I could still kick his ass today, based on the psychological advantage I now have over him. my kids are pretty dumb, eh?

No.

You really think they don?t know it?s bullshit?

They?re playing along.
 
Well, I didn't ask you, and he has pretty strong feelings about China, so I'm interested in his response.

Since you're here though, what is your opinion on China? You probably hate Chinese people, but like China itself for providing cheap labor and letting our billionaires shift production there and away from American workers. Right? That's consistent with your pro-billionaire, pro-wealth gap ethos.

DSF would have a lot less moronic content if you had to be asked for your dumb take on things before posting - maybe you should make that a rule for yourself. I?ve made my position on China quite clear - I?ve also explained to you on more than one occasion that it?s not billionaires that caused companies to offshore jobs - that was the fault of your beloved unions, bad trade deals, and burdensome regulation (much of it from your political party). Also, the evidence is indisputable - you?re the only or at least most egregious billionaire bootlicker.
 
DSF would have a lot less moronic content if you had to be asked for your dumb take on things before posting - maybe you should make that a rule for yourself. I?ve made my position on China quite clear - I?ve also explained to you on more than one occasion that it?s not billionaires that caused companies to offshore jobs - that was the fault of your beloved unions, bad trade deals, and burdensome regulation (much of it from your political party). Also, the evidence is indisputable - you?re the only or at least most egregious billionaire bootlicker.


Total horseshit. Plenty of jobs were lost to China or India or even Mexico that weren't union jobs. Even from states with terrible minimum wages like Tennessee, Georgia, and Kentucky lost jobs to outsourcing because Mexico's minimum wage just recently topped 260 pesos a day which is equal to about $12.65. Before that it was like they worked for free, but yeah....blame regulation, that seems to be the likely culprit, not the CEO's and major stockholders wanting a bigger yacht.
 
Yeah, I forgot how the CEOs of Ford, GM, Chrysler, and smaller manufacturers etc. were all driven to poverty by having to pay their union workers wages... you really had to feel sorry for them living in cardboard boxes like that.

Crazy they somehow remained afloat all those years, and just suddenly had to shift production to China in the 90's-00's like that.
 
Total horseshit. Plenty of jobs were lost to China or India or even Mexico that weren't union jobs. Even from states with terrible minimum wages like Tennessee, Georgia, and Kentucky lost jobs to outsourcing because Mexico's minimum wage just recently topped 260 pesos a day which is equal to about $12.65. Before that it was like they worked for free, but yeah....blame regulation, that seems to be the likely culprit, not the CEO's and major stockholders wanting a bigger yacht.

no, it's not total horseshit. It's not even a little bit horseshit. Jobs were first lost from the rust belt to lower cost regions within the US and they continued to be lost as jobs started to be offshored. Horrendous trade deals and overly burdensome regulation contributed to that trend. To say it has nothing to do with unions making laborers more expensive and it's because of a handful of boats is complete and utter horseshit.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top